Hello, I will be assisting you
Under Article IV Section 1 of the US constitution (known as the "Full Faith and Credit Clause") the 50 states respect judgments in each state. There are not such provisions internationally
In addition there is no bilateral treaty or multilateral international convention in force between the United States and any other country on reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments. In most states the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is governed by local statutes and the principles of comity, reciprocity and res judicata. This means that the judgment holder will have to go to court in the US and claim that:
(1) the foreign court had jurisdiction; (2) the defendant was properly served; (3) the proceedings were not fraudulant; and (4) that the judgment is not contrary to the public policy of the foreign country and the US.
Only then with the approval of the court will a local enter judgment in the US
At these proceedings the US defendant would be able to petition the court to dismiss the case, dismiss the foreign judgment or demand a US trial
In conclusion, it is possible to collect a foreign judgment in the US but it requires a court proceedings demonstrating the validity of the judgment
Thank you for allowing me to assist you
Please rate my service
Would it be possible to go into all of these?
I'm assuming that the 'standard' for each would be the USA standard, right? What are the US standards that would have to have been upheld for each of these?
The elements and standards are dependent on state law. In additional it is impossible to say at this early stage what how would each element play out without first seeing the underlying complaint that the foreign individual might bring.
In addition, there is no standard per say other than that certain state may statutory provisions that guide the acceptance of foreign judgments and then there are likely a multitude of cases that further explain the acceptance of such standards. As in any litigation the legal research that would be needed to address such cases is extensive.
Finally, much also depends on the facts surrounding the case and the foreign country and the court system there. A US court might give more deference to common law countries than to civil law countries or countries where the impartiality of the justice system is in question.
This has to do with employee rights,
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).