Very strange, because you should have been served the original complaint by process server or certified mail. Without knowing for sure if the motion for entry of default was granted (if it was there will be an order granting it), I'm guessing it was not. For some reason then (perhaps because no service was achieved? not sure) they decided to dismiss the case. Can you tell me if the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice?
At any rate - the motion for entry of default means they served a complaint, you never answered, and so they ask for a default judgment. If one was granted, you'd have to move to overturn it for lack of service (should be successful). However again, my guess is that it was not granted.
Request for dismissal means for some reason they decided to dismiss. This assumes you are the only defendant, and both of these motions were filed by the plaintiff? If the motion to dismiss was filed by another defendant, it means something very different for you, so that's an important distinction.
If the plaintiff filed the motion to dismiss, and it was with prejudice, it means the plaintiff cannot re-file the complaint against you. If the dismissal was without prejudice, they could re-file the same case against you within one year.
If another defendant filed the motion to dismiss, then you are unprotected and need to file your own motion to overturn default/motion to dismiss.
You should check the court file to see if either of these motions were granted, and read the motion to dismiss to see who filed it. If it was the plaintiff you should be fine and just check to see if it's with or without prejudice so you know if you should perhaps expect to receive another complaint.
Possible reasons they may have dismissed are that they didn't get you served on time and the summons expired.
Please let me know if you need more information, or have anything else about this information to share.
Thanks for the efficient reply.
1) The dismissal was marked without prejudice
Hi, are you there? All that came through is my name.
Oh, you are very welcome.
To: XXXXX XXXXX Only Please-
Re the same matter above, the original Motion To Dismiss docs were marked without prejudice.
On 8/21, we received via regular US mail a
Case Management Statement for the same case# XXXXX Unlimited Case" (amount exceeds $25,000.)
A Case Management Conference is scheduled on Sept 4, 2012 @ 8:45am Dept C22 Orange County Sup Court Santa Ana, CA
Notice of Intent To Appear by Telephone by Plaintiff's Attorney.
1. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs & cross-complainants only)
that the parties named in this complaint have a default entered against them (Our Company).
2. Trial date- Marked- No trial date has been set, N/A On July 9, 2012 default was entered against (our Company)
3. ADR package was provided as a mandated.
4. Other Issues- States On Jul 26, 2012 Plaintiff applied to court for default judgment to be entered.
The application was made for the court to proceed with the entry of default in lieu of live testimony to expedite the judgment and save judicial and the Plaintiff legal costs.
1. What does All this mean??
2. Do we need to seek local legal counsel at this late date or is this a "done deal"?
3. Is there anything we need to do before the Case Management Conference call on Sept 4th @ 8:45am?
4. Re ADR- We initially wrote letters and contacted the Plaintiff CEO, appropriate management and the Plaintiff's attorney requesting options to settle this issue PRIOR to the legal escalation, however they were not willing to work with us.
Q- Is there anything we need to do with the ADR form?
5. We are a small business and have been severely impacted by this issue financially.
Q. What can we do to protect the business, specifically our General Contractor's license now and for future income because of this judgment??
Thanks for your assistance..
This COULD just be an administrative court setting. The court sets a schedule for cases that are still on its docket and it's sometimes possible that they could have missed the filing of the dismissal.
Normally I would just suggest that you call the court and tell them the case has been dismissed, upon which they would check the file and close it out. However, since you have a setting on Sept. 4, you will not have time to do that.
So, my advice would be to show up on Sept. 4 at 8:45 with a copy of the dismissal in hand. Show it to whomever is presiding, and tell them your case has been dismissed and there have been no further filings to your knowledge (and if there have been, you have not been served).
If there is something unexpected, such as the case has been re-filed, then tell them you have not been served. They will grant a continuance until the plaintiff can serve you.
However, my best guess is that this is simply an administrative oversight, and once you present the copy of the dismissal the case will be closed.
Can you look at your dismissal and copy the text of it here, telling me who filed it and who was asking that the case be dismissed? Was there also an order dismissing the case?
Request For Dismissal- Marked OTHER- Breach of Contract
Dismiss without Prejudice, Complaint
Filed by- Attorney for Plaintiff- Brian R. Bauer (SBN 238368)
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLLP
Attorney Brian Bauer signed the Request for Dismissal on 7/26/12
I did NOT receive a separate order dismissing the case just the Case Management Statement.
CW Building & Remodeling Inc.
Is that all it says - it does not specify to whom they are asking to dismiss? Were you the only defendant? I noticed above you mentioned cross claimants, are there any other parties other than you and the plaintiff?
And also, can you tell if the motion was filed - is there a stamp from the court on it?
Request made to the Superior Court Of Calif, County of Orange
700 Civic Ctr Dr West Santa Ana, CA 92701
on behalf of the Plaintiff/Petitioner- Enterprise Rent A Car Co of Los Angeles (Our client of 5yrs)
Defendant/Respondent- CW Building & Remodeling Inc. et al.
*We are the only defendant named.
We are the only parties listed.
There is NO Stamp on my copy of the Request For Dismissal nor any other paperwork.
Ok. I'll appear in Court on Monday 9/4 and get back with you re results.
Thanks again for your help.
*Enjoy the weekend..
Re the above, I did go to court yesterday 9/4, it was a very fast procedure all Case Managements.
1. The judge stated because we were a Corporation, we must be represented by an attorney.
2. The Plaintiff's attorney was on the call.
3. I stated as you suggested, that "to my knowledge the case was dismissed" and asked for an extension to seek legal counsel.
4. Judge asked the Plaintiff's attorney re the dismissal-
He stated that the case was dismissed as to "DOES 1 to 25" as marked on the Request For Dismissal and that his reason for the request was to go to Case Management.
5. The judge would NOT extend but set a date of Oct 31st for the Motion to Request Entry of Default to be granted. No court appearance is necessary.
The judge did state I can still seek legal counsel but doesn't know if it would help at this point.
-I would appreciate your legal suggestions moving forward in protecting our CA GC license and any (future assets) which is our livlihood.
-Is there anything else we could do at this point?
-If not, what should we expect from this judgement?
-*Although I haven't found it, the original complaint was accepted by our office.
Are you able to handle this case on our behalf here in California?
Are you able to handle this case on our behalf (here in California) as suggested above, to get the default overturned and try to settle the case?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).