How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask rvlaw Your Own Question
rvlaw
rvlaw, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 8386
Experience:  NYC Trial Attorney 30+ years; Law professor ; BUSINESS LAW; CONTRACTS; TORTS; Arbitrator
3071004
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
rvlaw is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I have a procedural question. In Florida I had a state case

This answer was rated:

I have a procedural question. In Florida I had a state case that was removed to federal, and since it almost identical to a federal case I had also filed the two were consolidated by the judge. However the removed case had a remand decision pending that had not yet been ruled on.

My question is this: I want to object to the consolidation as I am within 14 days of the order, but I do not want to offend the Court (which has been exceedingly generous with me so far) by telling her that part of the case does not belong in her court and that I preferred it be decided in the State Court due to important compelling state interests in the enforcement of its own version of the federal law involved.

How can I best do this? Can I motion an objection to the consolidation in a nice way? or should I perhaps motion for partial remand? Please let me know what legal authority I can point to, if only one statute or case. I am acting pro se in this.
Hi, I’m a moderator for this topic and I wonder whether you’re still waiting for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will do my best to find a professional to assist you right away. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you. Thank you!
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Still waiting
Sometimes, finding the right Expert can take a little longer than expected and we thank you greatly for your understanding. We’ll be in touch again shortly.

Hi and welcome,

Let me see if there is a specific rule in the FRCP that covers this

rich

I have reviewed Rule 9027 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which govern removal. There are no statutes that refer to your unique situation.

You can make a motion and handle it delicately. Judges get motions all the time that challenge what they have done. Don't say "the case doesn't belong in your court"

The motion should generally contain

1. A recitation of the existence of the original federal case

2. The subsequent removal of the state case to the court.

3. The consolidation of the two cases by the court.

4. The fact that there is an outstanding remand decision pending regarding the removal of the state case.

and then say:

Prior to finalizing the consolidation of both cases, I respectfully XXXXX XXXXX Honorable Court:

1. To decide the Motion to Remand the state case before these cases proceed.; and

2. To issue an order staying all proceedings before this Court until the Motion to Remand is decided.

Please press 3 or 4 or 5 below so that I may get credit for assisting you.
have intended. Please do NOT press 1 or 2 since that will result in a negative rating for me which you may not If you want further information or clarification, just ask before you give a rating


I ask you to be fair in your rating. For instance, in these actual examples , the expert should not have received a negative rating:
a. A customer says "I ALREADY KNEW THAT".....but the expert didn't know what the customer knew or didn't know.
b. A customer wants to hear "YES YOU CAN".....but the certified legal expert says "LEGALLY NO YOU CAN'T".
c. The answer is short, but ACCURATE. A customer simply wants a longer answer.

Thank you for reading this and for your consideration. I'm always ready to help further.

rich

rvlaw, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 8386
Experience: NYC Trial Attorney 30+ years; Law professor ; BUSINESS LAW; CONTRACTS; TORTS; Arbitrator
rvlaw and 7 other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you