Ask a Business Lawyer. Get Business Law Questions Answered ASAP.
Proximate cause of the accident was the negligent sign posting, showing the wrong lane. Also, Chancit contributed to the injury by not wearing his seat belt. If Chancit had his seatbelt on he would not have been thrown from the car, so Ford is not liable. Ford gives ample warning and notice that seatbests are required, and could reasonabl anticipate that they would be worn. Chi-Chi's is a red herring. Finally, Chancit was negligent in over correcting.
If Ford cannot be completely absolved, then liability should be shared under the concept of contributory negiligence. City of LA, Chancit are both complicit, negligent and share liability. Chi-Chi's is a long shot.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).