Ask a Business Lawyer. Get Business Law Questions Answered ASAP.
Under the law of partnership, all partners were jointly and severally liable for the debts, because the acts of one partner, acting within the apparent scope of his authority, bound the entire partnership. The court found that the trial court did not clearly err in determining that the mechanic's liens, held by the suppliers, were inferior to the construction mortgages perfected by the banks. The mortgages were recorded prior to the commencement of the construction of the improvements on each project site, so they were prior to the suppliers' liens, relating to construction materials obtained thereafter. Further, the mortgages were valid under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 51-605, because the "aggregate sum" requirement in the mortgage satisfied the requirement that the mortgage record the banks' obligation to advance money. However, several of the liens were invalid because the liens were not timely filed under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 51-613.The court affirmed Vermont Place's liability to the banks, as priority creditors by virtue of their mortgages, and then to several of the suppliers, as holders of valid mechanic's liens.
Thus, Vermont Place is liable to the suppliers.