The Johnsons filed a complaint for the wrongful death of their son that occurred when he and Mr. Johnson were struck by NAC's truck. The trial court granted NAC's motions for summary judgment as to Johnson's claims for punitive damages, but denied defendants' motions as to plaintiff father's emotional distress claim. The parties appealed.
The court reversed the dismissal of the punitive damages claim against defendant employee because such damages were permissible in cases involving drunk driving if extreme, outrageous, or shocking behavior occurred. The dismissal of the punitive damages claim against defendant employer was reversed because there was a material issue of fact as to whether wrongful acts were committed or specifically authorized by defendant employer or were committed by defendant employee who was recklessly employed. The court affirmed the decision denying the motion as to the emotional distress claim because plaintiff father, who was a parent in the "zone of danger," could recover for the trauma associated with seeing a child injured.The court reversed the decision dismissing the punitive damages claim against defendant employee because such damages were allowable in drunk driving cases. The decision dismissing the punitive damages claim against defendant employer was reversed because an issue of fact existed. The decision denying defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff father's claim for emotional distress was affirmed because he was in the zone of danger.
The appeal court remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Thus, no decision as to liability was ultimately decided. However, based on the ruling, NAC is liable to the Johnsons.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).