Dave had a duty to Pal to not act negligently and he violated that duty. Ejecting a paint can into the street was the actual and proximate cause of Pals harm. Pal was contributorily negligent and if this is a contributory negligence state, Daves liability is limited to 50% as a result. It is close but on these facts, Dave is an I.C. Pal's lawyer should try to sue the LLP but his chances of success are small. Ben is a 30% owner of the LLP and had "apparent authority" to buy a truck. Cal owed his LLP a "first right of refusal" on his deal and breached his fiduciary duty to the LLP. A lawyer can become a member of an LLP. His "contribution" to the capital of the LLP is his "sweat equity", that is, doing it's legal work.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).