Who was conducting the investigation and for what purpose? Was the lawyer you are referring to your lawyer? If so what did he have to submit that was not submitted and what would the submission have shown?
the first lawyer upon the notice of complaint and asking of DOH for our side of the story , I hired an attorney to submit the documents as to dr.;s licenses and assistan licenses and affidavids from them expressing that the compiant was a discrental employee and no assignments are given to assistants that is suppose to be done by doctors. and further more assistants showing their florida licenses and affidavid that such things as alleged by discredtal employee was not truthful. a copy of a voice mail by the compaintant on my voice mail to pay her money by tomorrow or she will mmake a lot of trouble including going to DOH. the first lawyer that I hired failed to submit anything in defence to doh evaluation of the case or include how the investigator lied, and that I did never admit to this taking place. he sat silently, and i was not gettiing copies of documents and requests since he was the council until probable cause determined that there is sufficint evidence to investigate this case. he then called me and asked for 50000 to make this go away, and in my question did you not give them the evidense he replied yes, but we need to dipose these people and they are going to cout.
I terminated him as a layer and hired another one that presented all the evidense to DA office and they requsted charts for the days she worked . he also sue the DOH and its investigatores conduct, and to this date nobody has gone to court.
Now as the statute of limitation expires in a few months, DOH is offering to remove all investigation in this matter and find in our favor, if we accept to drop charges against the DOH and the investigator, as well as waiving any attorney fee requests, and my attorney thinks we should take the offer even though I suffered emotionally and financialy and the practice had the mark that it was under investigation, and doctor aand eployees left and I have become disabled largly as a result of this investigation remainig pending for nearly 5 years. we even asked them after over 2 years of inactivity to dismiss the investigation and they would not file a suite in court either. My lawyer thinks I should sattle with that because if we go to court they subpenoa more cgarts and may make more expense and might find something that is not right . mu thinking is with you we should wait till the five years is over and then sue them in court.
Your attorney has a much better understanding of the situation and I suggest you take his advice. As for the suit against the other attorney, I think you need first to get the case dismissed with you being cleared of all charges. To successfully bring suit against the former attorney you will need the agency to say that had they had the information your new attorney provided at the commencement of the case they would have dropped the investigation. Then you will need another attorney to testify that it was negligent not to provide the DOH with the information you provided to the attorney. If these two things can be established then you would have a malpractice claim against the first attorney. If he provided the information and the DOH did not act on it until your second attorney got involved, you probably to do not have a suit against the first attorney.
If this answer is responsive to your question, please accept it. That is how we are compensated. It would also be appreciated if you provided feed back on your view of the answer. Finally, if the answer was especially helpful you can provide a bonus. If I can be of further assistance or you have other questions in the future you can ask for me and reach me at this site.
This communication is not intended as legal advice. A local attorney should always be consulted for legal advice. No client/attorney relationship is intended or created by this communication.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).