How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask lwpat Your Own Question
lwpat, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 25386
Experience:  Attorney with over 35 years of business experience.
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
lwpat is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

This is the question and my response plus the professors response.

Resolved Question:

This is the question and my response plus the professors response. I believe that my answer is correct and am trying to find precedent to prove her wrong.
Submitted: 4 years ago.
Category: Business Law
Expert:  lwpat replied 4 years ago.
I can't get it to download. Will try later today when I get out of court
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Thank you. I can upload again if need be
Expert:  lwpat replied 4 years ago.
I will let you know
Customer: replied 4 years ago.
Looks like mediafire is having issues. Try this one.
Expert:  lwpat replied 4 years ago.
I will have to get it after court
Expert:  lwpat replied 4 years ago.

If the offeree rejects the offer, the offer has been destroyed and cannot be accepted at a future time. A case illustrative of this is Hyde v. Wrench (1840) 49 E.R. 132, where in response to an offer to sell an estate at a certain price, the plaintiff made an offer to buy at a lower price. This offer was refused and subsequently, the plaintiffs sought to accept the initial offer. It was held that no contract was made as the initial offer did not exist at the time that the plaintiff tried to accept it, the offer having been terminated by the counter offer.

This letter was delayed in the mail and was received by IBM on July 25th at 9:30 am.

A rejection is effective when received so the offer was still effective for acceptance unit July 25th

On July 23rd, IBM changed its mind and at 9:00 am the same day mailed a letter to Hometown stating that IBM had sold the equipment to a third party.

The offeror is the master of the offer and can withdraw it at any time. However, the withdrawal must be communicated to the offeree. An offeror may revoke an offer before it has been accepted, but the revocation must be communicated to the offeree, although not necessarily by the offeror: Dickinson v. Dodds (1876) 2 Ch.D. 463. Therefore the offer was withdrawn on July 24 at 10.

Issue: Was the fax an acceptance and was a contract formed.

The mailbox rule excludes contracts involving land, letters incorrectly addressed and instantaneous modes of communication. The fax was received

July 24th at 11:00 am. Therefore the offer had been withdrawn at 10 and there was no contract formed.

You have to analyze each transaction to see the effect and state the rule for that transaction

lwpat and 3 other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Business Law Questions