Does the consortium want you to be on the project or at least compensated for the time you have put in?
If you can get the approval of the consortium to pay you and they can recover that would be the best course of action. It is difficult to recover on quantum meriut against the government because if there is a statutory procedure to follow before the state can pay, it will supersede even a well founded claim in quantum meriut.
This communication is not intended as legal advice. A local attorney should always be consulted for legal advice. No client/attorney relationship is intended or created by this communication.
The implied acceptance of the "in-hand" and signed by myself contract; and approved of by on its face as written by the mutual inputs by the fiscal agent, and the services-receiving consortium members through their continued evaluations, communications, planning, implementation of plans/execution in process created the quantum meriut status.
Yes that is coirrect but generally a government agency is not bound to pay on quantum meriut because it must pay based on appropriated funds and contractural procedures that generally require that it go through its own approval process which requires it to execute the contract to be bound.
What I am likely going to have to swallow is what the District Court Judge said in the previous case and parelleling circumstances: "Show me a signature of the second party, though receiving services of value, and I will order the dollars of value up to the receipt of the letter of quit be paid." Though being a contract for the same services and intent of purpose as the year 2020/11, the continuation of the activities does not then constitute and implied contract while I possess documentation of the consortium members' wishes and pleasure? I very much appreciate your response, but the state was to carryout the wishes of the consortium. Will see how the billings for the quantum meriut is addressed in my situation verses the prior case.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).