Ask a Business Lawyer. Get Business Law Questions Answered ASAP.
2&3: Can the altered invoices and/ or the statement of the auditor are enough preliminary facts to conclude the evidence of tampering even tampering without purpose or benefit ?
4-How could we explain the citations posted in our annual credential verification with third parties if being requested ?
However, inspector has onhand copy of both invoices, 1 original she received from the seller replying to her request, and 1 id the ones altered by the stupidity of the manager, is that enough voe an evidence to prosecute ?
The manager is willing to bear all responsability about her stupidity, Can the store is still be affected ? How the store can get rid of bad record ?
Thanks a lot
Please answer my last question, I will pay you the amount you prefer
I would like to get a bit more confidence, so, let's review again:
There are 2 State departments involved, one who did the audit 0n 2004 (the Department A) and another one (The Licensing Board B) who worked beside the latest audit in 2009-
The Department (A) processed the incidence from 2004 but did not kill us, just put a notice on their system for more follow up audits, which the last one in 2009 came up with no discrepancies found again, but the Department (A) was forward the final report with the whole history from 2004 to the Board (B) as a complaint-
The Board Inspector did her own investigation with in favor of us, but asking us a report about the incidence on 2004 even she has everything on hand (that you say enough for prosecute)-
My question are:
1-Why they did not kill us on 2004?
2-Even the 2009 Citations (from the Board B) says "If the hearing is not requested to contest the Citation(s), timely payment of any fine(s) and submission of Proof of Abatement shall not constitute an admission of the violation(s) charged . Payment in full of the fine(s) assessed shall be represented as a satisfactory resolution of the matter in any public disclosure ... (Bus & Prof code...)...". Is that possible the citation payments can be that the Department (A) is waiting for to push forward a kill (suspend the provider contrac because of bad credential records) ? If so, based on reference authorities (Bus & Prof Code....) can we then request an appeal ?
Thank you again
Please answer me few more questions above- I will pay separately-
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).