Good afternoon. If you treat the entity as a separate entity, it is a limited liability entity and it is very difficult task to pierce the corporate veil. It makes no difference if the LLC was formed for the sole purpose of a particular activity. In fact, most LLC's are single-purpose entities formed solely for such purposes. Your insurance agent should stick to the insurance business....insurance agents are biased anyway because this eliminates the need to purchase insurance and thus he doesn't get his commission.
I hope this has given you the guidance you were seeking. I wish you the best of luck!
If you have a follow-up question, please remember that there might be a delay between your follow up questions and my answers because I may be helping other clients or taking a break.
If I have adequately answered your question, even though the answer might not have been the one for which you hoped, I would appreciate it if you would please click the GREEN ACCEPT button so that I receive credit for my work; otherwise, though you have made a deposit, I do not receive credit.
If you need additional clarification on this question after clicking ACCEPT, please do not hesitate to click Reply and I will be happy to do what I can to help you further. Thanks for allowing me to be of service to you.
The information given here is not legal advice. As all states have different intricacies in their laws, the information given is general only. This communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship with you. I hope this answer has been helpful to you.
What you say makes sense because it is as far as I can tell common for joint owners of an aircraft to form an LLC for the specific purpose of managing the funding of the aircraft AND for liability protection. Yet I have also heard horror stories about litigants peircing the corporate veil. Not specifically anything to do with aircraft LLCs -- more cases where someone has essentially been operating a small business as a sole proprietor after having formed a corporation.
You wrote in part "If you treat the entity as a separate entity, it is a limited liability entity and it is very difficult task to pierce the corporate veil."
By "treat the entity as a separate entity" do you mean that we don't use it for other personal purposes (such as depositing our personal savings in it, or buying groceries or paying rent out of the LLC's bank account? Or do you mean something else?
I have not yet opened a bank account for our new LLC (expect to shortly).
The bank will require a social security number or an IRS or TIN -- A Tax Identification Number (Tax ID), also called an Employer Identification Number (EIN), Although it is highly unlikely we'll be hiring any employees except remotely possible casual labor to, say, clean a hanger, and will never have any tax liability (because no income) in the LLC, it seems to me that keeping my or my other member's personal SS numbers off the primary account ownership at the bank may be either purdent or even necessary.
Are you aware of any considerations that I would do well to be cognizant of in either applying to the IRS for an EIN or giving the EIN to the bank?
If I need to proceed to set up the account before I can get hold of the EIN is bank likely to be willing to let me change the
You will need to apply for the EIN. Your bank will require it to open an account and you will want your LLC to have its own identity. Were you the only owner, you could treat this as a disregarded entity, but I would still recommend you get an EIN for it. With two owners, you must get an EIN. You can do this on-line at the following website and have your EIN within about 10 minutes... http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98350,00.html
Bear with me briefly?
I actually am already on the IRS site --
partway through the application for the EIN/TIN.
After the first few steps where I entered my state and that there are two members in our LLC I got this text from their proceedure:
Due to the number of members in your LLC, you are considered a Multi-Member Limited Liability Company (LLC) as the type of structure applying for an EIN.
Since you are a Multi-Member LLC we must initially classify you as a "Partnership"
If you do not wish to accept the default classification of partnership, you can File Form 8832 (Entity Classification Election) to elect Status "Corporate Status", or File Form 2553 (Election by a Small Business Corporation) to elect S Corporation Status. If you need to change your type of structure, we recommend that you do so now otherwise you will have to start over and re-enter your information.
Somehow I think I do not want us to be considered a partnership, but am not at all sure whether that's any hazzard to us (I vaguely recall that what the IRS considers you does not effect the LLC protection that the state LLC provides and hope it does not create more combersome filing requirements (remember we will never have any income -- although I suppose we COULD have a "loss").
Is it OK to just proceed at this step, or is it advisable to go for the one of the other two statuses -- and if so which one? I'd rather not have to fill out yet another form and leave this smooth looking EIN routine if there's no compelling reason to. Can you help?
Hello again. Thanks for your earlier answers.
Another possibly critial issue at least implicit in my original question about the liability protection of an LLC, appeart to not have been addressed:
Someone pointed out that even if the LLC does protect a liability incurred by one member's actions from spreading to the personal asetts of OTHER members that it does not protect a member from liability for his/her actions. Just For example, member-pilot John drives the plane on the taxi-way into an expensive nearby Learjet and the LearJet owner claims it is soley Pilot-A's negligence and that there's $100K in damage and sues for damages. It was suggested that although the Learjet owner can't go after Pilot/owner's-B's personal assets (home, or whatever) he can not only go after the LLC's small value (say $30K) but can indeed go after Pilot/owner A's personal assets. In short that the person doing the claimed damage has unlimited PERSONAL liability and the fact that the aircraft is owned by an LLC would not limit THAT. That the LLC may limit the liability both owners in their role as OWNERS but not in their role as individual pilots' actions.
In short, as a legal and practical matter they should not consider "being in the LLC" in any sense a substitute for liability insurance.
Is that correct?
On a similar tack: If on the other hand, say the aircraft burst into flames unattended and the liability would be limited to the "owners" of the aircraft, and in THAT case liability WOULD be limited to whatever assets were in the LLC. Do I have that right.
Pardon these convoluted sounding "what if" questions, but it seems prudent to inquire into them BEFORE faced with them rather than after.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).