How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Law Educator, Esq. Your Own Question
Law Educator, Esq.
Law Educator, Esq., Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 114028
Experience:  All corporate law, including non-profits and charitable fraternal organizations.
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
Law Educator, Esq. is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Please refer to this article as it is the basis for my question

This answer was rated:

Please refer to this article as it is the basis for my question: “Spoliation of Evidence”
The case I am in involves a plaintiff that moved the online business that is the center of the litigation one month after filing suit against me resulting in multiple file folders from the very massive 13 year old ecommerce site to become corrupted / ruined. Including files I need to defend myself. The plaintiff and his IT person (now expert witness) knew there was a portion of the site locked and encrypted by encryption key by me until the note was paid in full, per our contract, they moved without the key causing significant damage and loss of evidence.
I just cannot help but wonder if the Spoliation of Evidence Law is the answer
If they knew there was going to be evidence in the matter and that moving it to another server could cause it to be lost, then spoliation of evidence is indeed a claim you can make in your case. The key to this is the court looks at the intent to destroy the evidence, whether malicious or not, so this is going to go to the reason they had for moving the files.

I hope you found my answer helpful, please click on the GREEN ACCEPT button above for my answer. This is necessary for me to be paid for my work and so that I can get credit for assisting you. Your question will not close, and you will still have the opportunity to follow-up if needed. Leaving a bonus and positive feedback is not required, but doing so is certainly appreciated!

If you have additional questions, please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. Please consider that I am answering the question or question that is posed in your posting based upon my reading of your post and sometimes misunderstandings can occur. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered.

Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.

There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be helping other customers or taking a break.

You can always request me through my profile at or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”

Law Educator, Esq. and 2 other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 5 years ago.

Greetings Paul,


The deposition has finally happened to the party who owes me for my business. In regards to the above matter his reply was: "He knew he did not have the encryption key needed to move the enitre site but felt because I held security to the site he was afraid I may attempt to regain control."


In other words he admits he understands the site was secured against the monies he owes me. He moved it anyways - how is this not an admission of theft? Why do I have zero rights for collections on the funds he owes me? Honestly I feel as if I need to find new cousel - again.... This has been going on now for 20 months and the first court date is not until November 2012 - one year away.... Do I have any recourse to end this sooner and recoup- my funds or my business?


Thank you again!

IF he admitted to destroying not only evidence intentionally, but intentionally destroying your security interest, then you would consider filing your motion for summary judgment which is where the standard is that given all of the facts and evidence there are no material facts in dispute and viewing those facts in a light most favorable to the non-moving party you are still entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Here, the defendant did not pay you, he admitted to destroying the security interests and evidence and as such those facts based on his deposition are not in dispute and as such you would deserve a judgment in your favor.
Customer: replied 5 years ago.

Thank you - this is the excat answer I found in the Wi Law Library. My attorney claims it is "to soon to attempt this" I fully disagree and from your answer you do as well. Do I search for new counsel? Do I attempt this motion alone in the courts? I am more confused than when this action began - I see a clear end and yet my counsel is blind to it - how would you suggest I proceed?


Thank you thank you thank you - I wish with all my heart you were in Wisconsin - I would retain you today. You are a complete stranger and have answered every question when the attorney I have now paid $67K in legal fees sends answers on average after 7 to 10 days after neing asked.



It all depends on how much more evidence is remaining to be gathered. Generally, the MSJ is filed upon the completion of discovery. Filing too soon may allow the defendant to come up with some evidence to dispute a material fact which would defeat your MSJ and you only get one shot at the MSJ and this is why attorneys wait until the discovery period is over to prevent the other party from coming up with last second evidence to dispute your material facts.
Customer: replied 5 years ago.

I promise last question - to your reply - there has been what was called 1st Round Discovery and Interagotories(poor spelling I am sure). For the most part all the questions and requests were denied. How many "rounds" of discovery is common? Is there a limit to the number of discovery rounds?


Thanks :)


The courts set the discovery schedule and determine the deadline date for filing dispositive motions, which is what an MSJ is. The problem is that until discovery has actually ended, which means that neither party can introduce anything else as evidence in a case, attorneys hate to submit an MSJ because of the fear of being surprised with some evidence that could still be produced in the case because discovery is still open.
Customer: replied 5 years ago.
Makes sense in an odd sort of way.... Learning I NEVER want to be in court again when this nightmare ends. I applaud your conviction to stay in such a difficult industry. Thank you with all my heart thank you!
Thank you.

Related Business Law Questions