How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask socrateaser Your Own Question
socrateaser
socrateaser, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 38507
Experience:  Retired (mostly)
10097515
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
socrateaser is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

RE capital stock certificate purchased 1924 for the assumed

This answer was rated:

RE: capital stock certificate purchased 1924 for the assumed name Dorney Park Amusement Company(entity created 12/17/1903).
Reference in Pa. Treasure Rpt Dec 1912. Entity number 97627
Dissolve date 2/9/1928.
The assumed name was dissolved and the business continues.

This is a non signed certificate.
Is there reason to believe it has ownership value. There were several ownership changes including Cedar Fair in 1992
If the certificate is not signed, then the share was not legally authorized by the issuer.

Theoretically, if you could prove that the failure to sign was intended to defraud the purchaser, and you only now discovered the fraud, then you could sue the successor owner and try to hold them to the original purchase value.

But, an important primary element of the claim would be proof of purchase -- so unless you have a receipt for payment or cancelled check, etc., showing that the original purchaser actually paid for the share, then the case would fail, because the purchaser would have never suffered any damages for receipt of the worthless certifiecate.

Hope this helps.

Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney (or, for the purpose of obtaining debt relief counseling under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code); (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.

Customer: replied 6 years ago.

It is signed by President and Treasurer.

The sell assigned does not have a signature. The purchaser is either my grandfather or my father. Both have passed away.

I have photos of certificate

Customer: replied 6 years ago.

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

Okay, then the owner of the share should have been paid out prior to the dissolution of the company. Since the certificate was valid, the owner should have filed suit to recover his share of the certificate within 20 years of the date of dissolution.

Otherwise, the lawsuit would be barred by the PA statute of limitations.

Your case was actually stronger with the certificate unsigned by the company officers. Now, I think you're toast. But, you could present the certificate to the current owners and ask if they will honor it. Who knows -- you could get lucky!
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

The desolvement seems to be for an assumed name. Does that make a difference.

The state indicated that there was some type of dual filing by both DPAC( corp) and Cedar Fair (sole propritor). I also plan to do a docket search.

I plan to see if the company will honor the certificate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the original business still exists and only the assumed name is XXXXX XXXXX the original business would remain liable for the certificate. However, it's not clear to me how a stock certificate could ever be issued in an assumed name. Which starts raising the specter of a fraud again.
Customer: replied 6 years ago.
I believe that is the circumstances
Well, then you may have a case here. Of course, your cert may not be worth the cost of fighting about it, but it's certainly worth investigating.

Best of luck!
socrateaser and 3 other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

Thank you.

Dorney Park is one of the oldest amusement parks in the country and is now part of a major corporation.

You have been most helpful

You bet. Go get em'!
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

I have submitted a claim to redeem the full value of the capital stock certificate.

I'll let you know what happens

Great! Should be interesting!
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

FYI There was an effort to sell Dorney for 2.4 Billion

 

Cedar Fair's History of Dorney does not mention DPAC

 

1923: In 1923, The Coaster was built. This wooden roller coaster, made from pressure treated pine, was originally a simple out-and-back ride until it was reconfigured to form a figure eight in 1927. During that same year, the Park incorporated and was renamed "Dorney Park Coaster Company, Inc.," and Robert Plarr, Bill Ruske and Ray Sandt purchased the Park from the Allentown-Kutztown Traction Company. A few years later, Robert Plarr purchased the Park outright from his partners.

I need to charge more!

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here