How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask N Cal Attorney Your Own Question
N Cal Attorney
N Cal Attorney, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 8983
Experience:  Since 1983
Type Your Business Law Question Here...
N Cal Attorney is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

What is the meaning of legal term, This contract becomes effective

Customer Question

What is the meaning of legal term, "This contract becomes effective upon full execution"? If the contract was not signed by both parties, is it not effective?
Submitted: 6 years ago.
Category: Business Law
Expert:  N Cal Attorney replied 6 years ago.
Sounds exactly right. Full execution means signed by both parties.

"if the evidence shows that the signatures of other parties were required as one of the conditions of the completed agreement, it is incomplete and not binding upon those who sign until the others sign. From ¶ 53 of Roth v Garcia Marquez
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

That is the confusion.


The language does not specify what is considered full execution nor does it explicitly mention signatures, simply that the settlement contract will become effective upon full execution. Or is it full execution in the sense of both parties executing all terms of the contract?


Does it mean execution of both signatures as one defendant did not send copy of he signed contract so is it only binding for those who signed or not at all?

It is confusing.

Expert:  N Cal Attorney replied 6 years ago.
I read it to mean that the contract only takes effect when it is signed by all parties. In this context "execution" means signing the contract, and each party signing it is like a condition precedent, as in the Marquez case, so until the last party signs it there is no contract in force. IMHO

"This contract becomes effective upon full execution": That is an express condition:
]_Banner Entertainment, Inc. v. Superior Court (Alchemy Filmworks, Inc.), 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 598_95 CONTRACTS_ 95I Requisites and Validity_ 95I(C) Formal Requisites__95k35 k. Signature._Formerly 95k32_Cal.App.2.Dist.,1998_Under California law, when it is clear, both from provision that proposed written contract will become operative only when signed by parties as well as from any other evidence presented by parties that they both contemplated that their acceptance of contract's terms would be signified by their signing it, then parties' failure to sign agreement means that no binding contract was created, even though the party later sought to be bound by agreement indicated a willingness to sign it._

Customer: replied 6 years ago.

Thank you. One more question?


If this is the case, what is your opinion on the following?


Given the unsigned settlement agreement was meant to replace the first breached contract, if the latter is not in effect (Due to one missing signature), since money exchanged hands based on belief that this new settlement agreement would cure the previously breached one --does this mean we are back to the original contract legally if the one mising sgnature invalidates the new contract?


Considering money exchanged hands due to counting that the new contract was executed (While waiting for the other person's signed agreement), does this mean that we have reverted back to the original, previous breached contract or what are possibilities here in your personal or expert opinion? Whichever one is used on this forum?


What is the case IYHO, due to there being exchange of money (Between parties) that perhaps a judge might consider to be a cure to the previous breach, if the language in fact invalidates the settlement agreement making it invalid? I am going by different legal scenarios I have seen on legal shows.

What is your best interpreaion on this?

Is the cure to this error to try to obtain the ONE missing signature? If we cannot obtain that one signature, is the scenario above at play?

Expert:  N Cal Attorney replied 6 years ago.
If the last person will not sign then there is no settlement agreement and the settlement money has to be refunded- If the settlement agreement actually specifies it is only effective upon full execution that is a clear condition precedent and merely acting like the agreement was valid does not make it valid unless maybe maybe maybe to person who failed to sign accepted all benefits due under the settlement contract.

You may want to have a local attorney review both the contract and the settlement contract, you can get a free consultation with some of the Florida business attorneys lisetd by location at

I hope this information is helpful.
N Cal Attorney, Attorney
Category: Business Law
Satisfied Customers: 8983
Experience: Since 1983
N Cal Attorney and other Business Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 6 years ago.

Thank you. I understand what you are saying.


I will do this. Is there a less expensive service? I realize that you said FREE consultation but that only goes so far really in contrat agreements. LOL.


Thank you again for your time,



Expert:  N Cal Attorney replied 6 years ago.
Thank you for accepting my answer.

The lawyers who advertise a free consultation all offer one-

JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • Dimitry K., Esq.

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Run my own successful business/contract law practice.
< Last | Next >
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Run my own successful business/contract law practice.
  • MShore Law's Avatar

    MShore Law


    Satisfied Customers:

    Drafted Negotiated and/or Reviewed Thousands of Commercial Agreements
  • RGMacEsq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed Texas General Practice Attorney
  • Barrister's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    15 years practicing attorney, MBA
  • J.Hazelbaker's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Experienced and trained in the area of business law.
  • MDLaw's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Experience in business law, contract law and related matters.
  • J. Warren's Avatar

    J. Warren


    Satisfied Customers:

    Experience in general business transaction and formation matters.

Related Business Law Questions