If the corporation was formed during marriage then all of its assets and liabilities are community property. The court has authority to order your husband to account for all of the funds removed from the corporate accounts and the court can make a blanket order freezing all of your husband's bank accounts until he makes that accounting.
Your attorney can require your husband appear at a hearing, which the court can expedite and identify the location of all of the funds, and if he refuses, the court can hold him in contempt and toss him in jail until he reveals the location of the funds.
That's how I'd play it, if I were representing you.
A person can be a shareholder, director, officer or employee of a corporation -- or, a person can be all of these things. A person can resign from any/all roles except that of a shareholder -- for that, the person must sell or gift their shares to someone else.
A shareholder has the right to vote at shareholder meetings for corporate directors, and on extraordinary matters such as mergers and consolidations.
A director has the right to vote at board meetings so as to effect corporate resolutions which will "direct" the course of the corporation's business dealings.
An officer has authority to run the day-to-day operations of the corporation, including hiring and firing employees.
An employee is person who labors on the corporation's behalf.
If your husband resigns as an officer and employee, then he would have no legal authority to take funds from any corporate bank account unless he held a board meeting and voted to pass a resolution directing him to remove the funds (or, unless such a resolution was already passed).
However, the bank has no way of knowing whether your husband's status has changed, unless someone (like you) informs the bank of your husband's resignation -- which should prevent any further withdrawals from the account -- but, not like a court order would do. Banks have their own rules, so without a court order, you can't really know what the bank may do in response to your husband's attempt to withdraw funds.
As far as the corporate bills are concerned, if you or your husband have personally guaranteed any debts, then each of you is jointly liable for those debts regardless of your actions under the corporation. Otherwise, neither of you are personally liable for corporate debts, but the corporation is liable for its own bills.
You mentioned that the corp pays the ranch payment. The issue is: does the corporation hold title to the ranch? If so, then the ranch could be reached by a creditor to pay corporate debt. If the ranch is held by you and your husband as community property/husband and wife/etc., then it would be safe from creditor attack.
It seems to me that your husband has sort of "lost it" for the moment, because his decisions don't seem to have any particular goal. I can't imagine why he has resigned, except as a show of independence/outrage (or, perhaps simply financial ignorance).
Hope this helps clarify things for you.
Under Washington law, your husband's earnings are community property, so you're entitled to one half of the funds, even if the corporation were determined to not be entitled to the funds. In the event that the corporation is to be put into liquidation bankruptcy, it actually may be better for your husband to take the money outside of the corporation, assuming that neither you nor your husband have personally guaranteed the corporation's debts to any third party/ies.
However, if a creditor were to get wind of what your husband is doing, then the creditor could force your husband to return the earnings to the corporation as a "fraudulent transfer" intended to "defraud, hinder or delay" the creditor's claim(s).
So, the issue here is whether or not your husband's earnings are corporate revenue or separate. The history of the corporation appears to show that the earnings belonged to the corporation. Your husband can certainly try to argue that the earnings were his and that they were contributions to the corporation, deposited by him to pay bills. This would be a really bad assertion, from the viewpoint of a creditor, because it would make it extremely easy to "pierce the corporate veil" and claim that the corporation was merely a front for your personal activities, therefore you and your husband are personally liable for all corporate debts, regardless of the corporate structure.
In sum, you would simply expand your show cause order to reach all of your husband's personal accounts as well as those of the corporation. You would also need an order that any of your husband's future earnings, pending divorce should be placed in trust so that he can't use them absent furthe orders of the court.
The grounds are that it's clear your husband is attempting to set up circumstances that permit him to treat what has always been corporate revenue as personal, and that this operates to the detriment of the community estate by providing third party creditors with an argument that would permit them to hold the community liable for corporate debt.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).