Bankruptcy Law Questions? Ask a Bankruptcy Lawyer Now.
In a 'primarily consumer debt' Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy can be dismissed (or converted to a Chapter 13 with the consent of the Bankruptcy filer) if the Bankruptcy filer does not 'pass' the Means Test.
This is provided for in Bankruptcy Code section 707(b)(1):
if it finds that the granting of relief would be an abuse of the provisions of this chapter.
Section 707(b)(2) explains what amounts to the presumption of abuse (basically not 'passing' the Means Test):
The issue in such a Bankruptcy is whether or not the debtor's debts are indeed primarily non-consumer debts.
So based on Section 707(b)(2) - are you saying that to qualify as a "business" Chapter 7, you still have to essentially pass the "means test?" If so, doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of creating a separate category for filing as a "business."
Once determined that the debts are primarily non-consumer debts, a case cannot be dismissed because of abuse - because the Means Test cannot be 'passed
My "consumer-debt" is primarily my first and second mortgages. I don't have any active credit cards, and the only unsecured "other" debts are a business line of credit collection from 1999 which is now at $46K, a judgment for $12.5K for a credit card, and an auto repossession collection of $4.5K. But the other $700K+ of "consumer" debt is the first and second mortgage on my former primary residence. In your view, would this type of debt be considered "abusive" according to your interpretation of the code?
You would not be able to deduct a rental expense for your wife and daughter to live in Florida.
If it were determined that your debts are primarily non-consumer debts, you would be able to convert your case to a
But given the information you provided, it seems clear that your debts are primarily non-consumer debts (primarily = more than 50%).
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).