Hello, and thank you for contacting Just Answer. My name isXXXXX am a bankruptcy law professional and I look forward to answering your question today. Give me just a moment to review your question.
704.060 as written should be applicable to any tool of the trade or commercial motor vehicle.
The statute specifically says:
704.060. (a) Tools, implements, instruments, materials, uniforms, furnishings, books, equipment, one commercial motor vehicle, one vessel, and other personal property are exempt to the extent that the aggregate equity therein does not exceed:
(2) Six thousand seventy-five dollars ($6,075), if reasonably necessary to and actually used by the spouse of the judgment debtor in the exercise of the trade, business, or profession by which the spouse earns a livelihood
So, the exemption amount allowed for a vehicle, or any other asset used in the trade by only one spouse is $6075, and would only be double that if both spouses use the vehicle for their trade.
In the situation you are describing, where only one spouse uses the vehicle (or any other tool) for their trade, the exemption amount is $6075.
While this would leave equity in the vehicle exposed, there are other exemptions, particularly the "wildcard" exemption that could be used to cover the remainder of the equity in the truck.
In such a situation, where there are potentially exposed assets, I would strongly encourage you to work in person with an experienced bankruptcy law attorney to make sure that all of your assets are protected to the extent possible .
For a referral to an attorney in California, the state bar association has a referral service that can be reached by phone at:
I am sorry, let me just correct one thing. If you did choose the exemptions under 704 (As opposed to choosing under 703), then there is not a wildcard exemption, but there is an exemption available for up to $2550 in an automobile that could be added.
This is where the debtor chooses to use the section 704 exemptions instead of the 703 exemptions.
Have you already filed for bankruptcy and chosen which exemptions to use or are you still considering your options?
Thank you. it is really helpful answer. But is it Wild car in section 704? It is in 703 only, I think. I afread to use 703 because of house equity. It Zellow show 163,000 and Loan amount 135,000, so it is 28,000 equity Is it covered under 703 section?
No I have to file tomorrow and I think to use Wiled card and partially cover equity
No, you are correct, the wild card exemption is not in 704, it is only 703, which is what I was trying to correct above. Under the 704 exemptions there is a vehicle exemption that can be used, as well as commercial vehicle used for trade, but not a wild card exemption.
Are you working with an attorney to file? Why do you have to file tomorrow?
Because it is set a court by one creditor and I have to filee bankruptcy before 05.01.2013
No I am doing bakruptcy by myself
By "set a court by one creditor" do you mean a creditor has taken you or your wife to court?
Just trying to set court againts my debt
What I think if wild card cover 25,000 and car is 10,000-12,000 , so rest I can apply to home equity and 10,000 not exempt I think trustee will not follow for 10,000
I understand, and having a creditor take action in court can be frightening. Ultimately, in choosing between each of the two exemption regimes, 703 or 704, there is a risk that the exemptions will not cover everything.
yes it is my concern
That is a real possibility. Unfortunately, it is difficult to know how a particular trustee will treat any specific amount of equity. With such a small portion of the equity of the home left open, it may be that the trustee will decide it is not worth their time or effort to try and seize the home as so little would be gained by it. However, there is certainly no guarantee of this. Ultimately, each trustee makes this decision for themselves, as to what is worth pursuing.
But the car is Salvage and I will take price/value from the dealer today. It could go to $8,000. You are helpful. Thank you
This is why it is worth consulting with an attorney in person in California, as they will often know trustees individually and how individual trustees will react in certain situations. This is, unfortunately, not something we can establish online.
I understand, and I am glad that I could be of some help to you. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Otherwise, please remember to RATE my answer so that I can receive credit for my work.
Hello, when I entering Creditors On Schedule F I see in credit history of Credit card in Activity Description "Transfer/Sold and in Charge Off - $1,400Amount, do I have to include this creditor into Schedule F?
Specialy if it is said Transfer/Sold? Thank you
Bank of America Status: Charge OffActivity : Transfer/Sold , No name to whom sold
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).