I probably should have been more explicit in my question, but I was jumping the gun. My primary concern is being able to keep my house. Maybe the question should have been something along the lines of "What can I do to enable me to do that?"
I am willing to continue paying on both the 1st and 2nd to the best of my ability. Currently, I am current on the 1st and behind 30 days on the 2nd. I will be able to be mostly current on the payments, I just cannot come up with the 200K to pay off the 2nd when it's due.
Am I understanding you to say that a chapter 13 would FORCE the 2nd note holder to re-extend my due date to some future date? That would be a great outcome for me,especially if it could be a 5-10 year extension. I really don't want to not pay them, I just can't do it now.
Also, thanks so much for such a quick reply. Now that I've taken the time to sit and write out the question, my stomach has been in knots. :-)
Typically, how long would that take to get somthing filed? This loan comes due in May. Would it be possible for something to get filed that quickly?
Thanks for the quick replies. I guess I'm off to try to set up an appt with a bankruptcy lawyer. Thank you again.
I have some add'l questions. Would it be possible for you to bill my card and answer some additional regarding this same issue?
Hi - Thanks for looking me up again.
If your card is on file with your account, you can ask/rate me here and your account with reflect the fee.
I'm online for the rest of the afternoon, so just post when you have time. Thanks.
I am concerned about whether I'd be 'approved' for a chapter 13 bankruptcy. I did consult a bankruptcy attorney and left there feeling relieved. But after doing some digging on my own, now I'm concerned again. And even thinking of typing this out so it makes sense to you is kind of daunting.
I don't want to pay an attorney to file the bankruptcy only to be denied. Originally after consulting the atty, I thought I understood them to say that if the Chapter 13 wasn't approved, I wouldn't be charged their fees. I guess I misunderstood that. I would be charged their fees regardless.
The paralegal and attornies asked some questions about my home mortgage, utilities etc. They asked about AGI and unsecured debt also. They said they felt comfortable that I'd be ok with the bankruptcy.
What they didn't ask about was my business expenses. They said that if I was put into a bankruptcy repayment plan, my mortgage holder would be kind of forced to rewrite my mortgage. That sounds positive. In case you don't remember, I'm current but facing a big balloon I can't pay.
I own a retail store (doing dismally recently).
So, I own a home worth probably 500K and owe a total of 300K. I have a 401K of 100K after the early disbursements I have taken. I have about 80K in unsecured debt and no other secured bills.
I have a couple of kids living with me and they'll say they pay me whatever a month I ask them to say. Obviously it'd have to look reasonably in line with their income.
The business is a skate retail store (shoes/clothing etc) so the expenses vary. The fixed costs like rent, utilities and payroll are easy. The monthly outlay varies for purchases but I'm currently pretty much breaking even of losing a tad each month. (i just moved the store so I expect that to improve, but can't prove it)
Is there some way I can gain any certainty in whether it makes sense to move forward with paying an attorney? How can I know how much monthly income I'll need to be able to prove? And is it even provable with most of the income source being the retail store?
Hi - thanks for the question.
Basically, in order to be eligible for a chapter 13 bankruptcy and get a repayment plan approved, you must be able to prove that you have enough income/cash flow to pay all of your debts. Here's a good article that outlines this: http://bankruptcy.findlaw.com/chapter-13/who-can-file-for-chapter-13-bankruptcy.html
You REALLY won't know exactly where you stand until after you file your case and begin negotiating with your creditors about extending the terms of your payments, etc. in order to make them where you can pay. For example, if you're paying $2500/mo on your current 20 year mortgage and you want to add 10 years and drop the payment to $1900/mo, that can make a lot of difference with your disposable income and the money you have to pay other creditors. The same would go for your other creditors.
By extending the repayment terms, you make your monthly obligation less, which makes your money go farther. But, as I said, it's a little tough to guarantee you how this will play out until you file and begin negotiating with your creditors. However, the attorney you spoke to should be able to give you a fairly good idea about whether or not you could make a plan work based on your debts and income.
Unfortunately, there's no formula or way to specifically determine this prior to filing. Instead, you just have to give it a shot and try to make it work. The good news is that most creditors are willing to compromise because they know that if you can't file a chapter 13, you may end up filing a chapter 7, which means they're going to get pennies on the dollar - - instead of being paid in full with interest under a chapter 13.
Maybe I'm confused about a chapter 13. Doesn't the majority of the unsecured debt go away ? I believe the atty said I'd repay about 3%. If I have to repay that in addition to the montly expenditures in 5 years, there's no way I'll qualify for a 13.
I am hearing two different things from two different attornies. I'm positive I didn't misunderstand either one of them, I've just got two different answers.
Again, I owe 100K on my 1st TD, and have a balloon of almost 200K on my 2nd due in May of this year.
The first attorney said because BK if a federal thing and the morgtage is federally controlled, the BK court would force the mortgage holder to refinance the mortgage, all 300K of it.
The 2nd attrney said the BK court would do nothing about the mortgage except stop the forclosure on the 2nd if the BK is approved BUT I would have to be able to pay the 200K in entirety over the next 5 years along with my other living expenses.
Can you address which of those two very different scenarios is correct?
OH MY GOOD GRACIOUS... another viewpoint. Now I'm not sure what to do or rather who to assume is correct.
I am not upside down, I have appx 200K in equity at todays values, certainly down from 2008, but relatively stable now.
So, question 1. If YOU are correct, can I assume that equity would be good enough to convince the court the lender wouldn't be in any worse position?
Question 2. If the lender wouldn't be in any worse position than a full chapter 7, would the court then "make" the lender refinance the mortgage without the balloon due now, but included in the refinance? I guess I'm asking if the lender would be forced to work with me or would they still be allowed to say no.
I'm going to leave this open for another day or two, but I'll be tipping big.
I can't tell you enough how much I appreciate having this sounding board of sorts to try to wrangle thru all this stuff I'm hearing and learning. Really, Thank You.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).