Hello and thank you for allowing me the opportunity to assist you.
I can only guess why your attorney did that, but I suspect it was relevant even if your share of the partnership was not considered marital property. The reason is that your net worth is important to the question of how property is divided and spousal support. You see, even though judges generally split marital property 50/50, it is not always done that way. If one spouse would be in a far better position financially after splitting the marital property 50/50, then the judge has the power to award the less fortunate spouse with more of the marital property. Moreover, if one spouse is in a better financial position, then that spouse is more likely to pay spousal support. So, it may have been in your best interests to have your share of the partnership assessed so that your ex wouldn’t be able to make a claim that it was worth more than it really was, and therefore, he/she is entitled to more marital property and/or more spousal support. Of course, as I mentioned above, I can only guess since I don’t know your attorney, her strategy, or other relevant facts.
Have I satisfactorily addressed your concerns? If not, then please feel free to ask for clarification.
If the information that I provided is helpful, then please remember to click the green accept button so that I will receive credit and compensation for my time. Positive feedback is always appreciated as well. Thank you and good luck!
DISCLAIMER: Please be aware that only an attorney licensed in your state is authorized to advise you in legal matters, and that the limitations of this setting may prevent your legal issues from being thoroughly addressed. Accordingly, please understand that (1) by answering your question(s) I am not acting as your attorney, (2) my answer(s) should be construed as general information only, and (3) our discussion is not an adequate substitute for an in-person consultation with an attorney.