Bankruptcy Law Questions? Ask a Bankruptcy Lawyer Now.
The United States Supreme Court has held that an "administrative freeze" placed on a debtor's bank account by a depositary bank did not violate the automatic stay because the freeze was temporary and the bank sought relief from stay to exercise its setoff rights. Citizens Bank v Strumpf (1995) 516 US 16.
However, to enforce a setoff of the frozen account funds, the bank moust prove that it has a right to the money under nonbankruptcy law and that this right should be preserved in bankruptcy under 11 USC §553. Hal, Inc. v U.S. (In re Hal, Inc.) (9th Cir 1997).
The typical example is where the bank requires a deposit account as security for a separate credit line. If this does not apply to your facts, then it's likely that the bankruptcy trustee will move to force the bank to release the hold and the money will become part of the bankruptcy estate, to the extent that the assets are nonexempt under Washington law and the facts of your case.
Hope this helps.
Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney; (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.
Setoff is not available to the extent that the creditor's claim is disallowed. See 11 USC §553(a)(1).
Setoff is not available for any portion of a creditor's claim that was transferred to it by an entity other than the debtor after the commencement of the case or within 90 days before the petition date while the debtor was insolvent. See 11 USC §553(a)(2).
Setoff is not permitted to the extent that the debt that the creditor owes to the debtor was incurred within 90 days before the petition date while the debtor was insolvent for the purpose of obtaining a right of setoff against the debtor. See 11 USC §553(a)(3).
Postpetition income can be used to satisfy a prepetition Chapter 7 debt, unless the income is from postpetition personal services. See 11 USC §541(a)(6)-(7). To the extent that the bank has frozen such income, along with prepetition income or non-personal service income, this would almost certainly violate the automatic stay.
I don't know enough about the facts and circumstances to know whether or not the bank has a legitimate claim to the money. That's why I've tried to give you all of the relevant law, so that you can filter your facts and see if the bank has a claim.
As for why the bank is freezing your account, in case you missed it, banks are practically immune to sanction. They can cheat borrowers, and then get the government to give them money back when the loans go bad. Banks can borrow at 0% and then charge borrowers more. They literally have a license to print money. Bank executives pay themselves enormous bonuses based on nothing but their desire to do so and the taxpayers pick up the bills. Banks get sanctioned occasionally for bad acts, but the amount of the sanctions don't affect their botXXXXX XXXXXne, because they get the money to pay the sanctions from the same taxpayers who are demanding the sanctions.
Why should a little thing like an administrative freeze or a bankruptcy contempt charge bother a bank???
I'm being completely serious here. Banks are effectively beyond the law, and no one in this country is doing anything about it.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).