Hello and thank you for allowing me to address your legal question.
In order to understand the term “summary judgment,” you must first understand that the point of a trial is to determine the facts of a case. For example, if you sue me for breach of contract, and I deny that I breached a contract, then the purpose of the trial would be to determine whether I breached a contract. Once that is determined, then the judge can make a decision to award damages (if there was a breach), or no damages (if there was no breach). However, if there is no dispute that I breached a contract (for example, if I admit it), then there is no point in having a trial; a judge can simply make a determination as to damages right away. So, the judge can make an immediate decision in a lawsuit when there are no disputed facts of material importance. When this happens, the judgment is called a “summary judgment.”
If a summary judgment has been given against you, then it has all the weight of an ordinary judgment obtained at the conclusion of a trial. The person with the summary judgment may enforce it by attempting to garnish your wages or bank account, or by selling your real estate or personal property. The specific methods available to collect on a judgment are determined by state law, so they vary depending on where you live (you didn’t mention your state). That said, you state that you have no assets. If you also have no income, then it is unlikely that the person with the judgment can do much against you to collect.
Did I answer your general question? If you have more specific info, I may be able to provide more insight.
If the information that I provided was helpful, please remember to ACCEPT my post as that is the only way I will receive credit and compensation for my answer. Thank you and good luck!
DISCLAIMER: Please understand that the complexities of most legal problems cannot be sufficiently addressed in this setting. Accordingly, my post is intended as general information only, and should neither be construed as specific legal advice, nor as an adequate substitute for the retention of legal counsel.