Ask an Australia Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
A tradesperson has issued an invoice 2.5 years after job has been completed for the first time. He sent it 2 weeks ago and now has sent a reminder with threats to adjudication under the Security of Payments Act.
Job was done in Melbourne Australia.
He was assigned the task (was verbal agreement) of installing cement sheeting underlay to a new property.
He used the incorrect nails (longer than required) and pierced the water pipes within the floor joists as the nails penetrated the full width of the flooring, causing water damage to the level below.
We had a verbal agreement that he wont invoice for his work $847.00.
My repair costs exceeded his invoice fees which were roughly $1000.00
He is now wanting payment?? What are my rights?
Should I ignore this or answer, and if i answer him would i legally implicate myself to further fees?
Thank you for your question. To Introduce myself I am a sydney based Solicitor and will do my best to provide you with relevant information to assist you.
Do you have evidence of the repairs that you had to do as a result of his negligence when doing his job?
Your rights are that you can claim against him for the repairs that were required as a result of his negligence.
You cannot ignore it. If you ignore what he has sent you, he will take the matter to the next step and then you will be in a position where you are finding him in court.
You need to respond and confirm the discussions between you and him and provide him with the evidence you have of his negligence and confirm that if he chooses to take this matter further you will cross claim against him for the full $1000.
Apart from the verbal agreements is there anything that you have in writing to confirm any of the discussions between you?
I do have evidence of invoices that were issued to me by the relevant tradespersons required to fix his damage.
His apprentice (who performed the work, unsupervised) is also witness, although he is distantly related to me, so not sure if this counts.
After talking to the HIA (housing industry Australia) they advised that I should not respond as there is a clause (Sec14 -5) which states that he has 3 months to issue the invoice, however sec 14 -6,7 &8 of the payments Act , further confuse me. I am not sure if this is just a scare tactic from the contractor.
It is also worth noting that it is out of character of him to invoice 2.5 years later. Generally he would invoice me at times even before a job was complete, and pestered me until he was paid. This seems it is just a way of extracting money from me, thinking that we forgot our agreement.
Unfortunately i dont have anything in writing between us.
Additionally, as he is claiming payment under the securities of payment act 2002, do i need to respond with a payment schedule, even though the invoice was sent after the prescribed time which I believe is 3 months?
Sorry, i dont understand the first sentence.
To clarify, the contractor (which i had a verbal agreement with to do the job) assigned his apprentice to do the work for him, although he did visit to check up on the apprentice.
It was not a progress payment, it was a one off full payment which section 14 -5 relates to i believe.
9(2) relates to progress payments.
if you recall when you had the discussion with him set out the date you told him about the issue and the repairs.
Excuse my ignorance, i still dont understand what you mean by the apprentice. Does the fact that he worked alone support my cross claim, is this what you mean?
The first part of section 5 states "A payment claim in respect of a progress payment that is a final, single or one-off payment may be served only within-". Does this help? I just want to be 100% sure, whether i need to respond under this Act in the form of a "Payment Schedule". Or is there anywhere else in the Act that has a cut off date regarding when an invoice (a single or one-off invoice) can be sent. I understand that I may have to pay under general law or the statute of limitation which is 6 years, just need the right direction so i am covered.
If I don't need to respond as such, then i can just write a general letter. I just want to legally do the right thing which would protect me from further claims against this person.
Futhermore, can i cross claim under the same Act or do i just need to send a seperate invoice.?
So i guess the vital question is:
The fact that he served the invoice 2.5 years after the job was finished (Claiming it is under the Security of payments act 2002) , regardless whether there was an agreement or not to nullify the invoice due to damage, does this invoice fall within the Security of payments Act? Or is it outside of the Act, which would then mean that i would not need to fill in a "Payment Schedule" as a response to why payment has been witheld?
If this invoice falls under the Act, then i would have to respond in the form a 'Payment Schedule" as required by Law. I would rather not respond in this manner as it is a very tedious exercise. However if it is required, can i cross claim under the "payment schedule"?
Hope the above makes sense. Could you please clarify.
Thanks for your assistance.(apologies for being pedantic!)
So to clarify, since he is out of time under the act, i am not required to respond by a form of a payment schedule, is this correct?
Or is a payment schedule mandatory either way, this is what i am unsure of?
And since he is out of time under the Securities of payment Act, does he have the right to adjudication against me (as he has threatened, or is this possible for invoices that only fall within the Act), or would he need to pursue payment via the limitations of actions act.
Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter.
I hope this is of assistance. If I have missed anything, or you have any further questions please let me know before leaving any feedback.
If I have assisted please do not forget to leave me with positive feedback.
you may have overlooked my last question.
Since he is out of time under the Securities of payment Act, does he have the right to adjudication against me as per Sec 18 to 28 (as he has threatened, or is this possible for invoices that only fall within the Act),
Also Sec 9(2)(b) as you refered to "progress payments" and not payments in full or one off payments which is in my case. Is this still OK, am i exempt from him pursuing me via the securities of payment act you stated?
A am a bit confused here.
Ok I understand what you mean, the heading to Sec 9 states "rights to progress payments". this is where the confusion may be at my end as i thought the term "progress payments" did not apply to my case since the invoice was for a once off payment!
I have accidentally rated you twice, not realising that I will be charged twice, can the 2nd charge please be refunded.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).